Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHamlin, Michael J.en
dc.contributor.authorWilkes, Danielleen
dc.contributor.authorElliot, Catherineen
dc.contributor.authorLizamore, Catherineen
dc.contributor.authorKathiravel, Y.en
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-20T23:25:19Z
dc.date.available2019-01-29en
dc.date.issued2019-01-29en
dc.date.submitted2019-01-11en
dc.identifier.citationHamlin, M.J., Wilkes, D., Elliot, C.A., Lizamore, C.A., & Kathiravel, Y. (2019). Monitoring training loads and perceived stress in young elite university athletes. Frontiers in Physiology, 10, 34. doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.00034en
dc.identifier.issn1664-042Xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/10680
dc.description.abstractWith increased professionalism in sport there has been a greater interest in the scientific approach to training and recovery of athletes. Applying appropriate training loads along with adequate recovery, is essential in gaining maximal adaptation in athletes, while minimizing harm such as overreaching, overtraining, injury and illness. Although appropriate physical stress is essential, stress for many athletes may come from areas other than training. Stress from may arise from social or environmental pressure, and for many athletes who combine elite athletic training with university study, academic workloads create significant stress which adds to the constant pressure to perform athletically. This research aimed to determine if subjective stressors were associated with counterproductive training adaptations in university athletes. Moreover, it aimed to elucidate if, and when, such stressors are most harmful (i.e., certain times of the academic year or sports training season). We monitored subjective (mood state, energy levels, academic stress, sleep quality/quantity, muscle soreness, training load) and objective (injury and illness) markers in 182 young (18–22 years) elite athletes over a 4-year period using a commercially available software package. Athletes combined full-time university study with elite sport and training obligations. Results suggest athletes were relatively un-stressed with high levels of energy at the beginning of each university semester, however, energy levels deteriorated along with sleep parameters toward the examination periods of the year. A logistical regression indicated decreased levels of perceived mood (0.89, 0.85–0.94, Odds Ratio and 95% confidence limits), sleep duration (0.94, 0.91–0.97) and increased academic stress (0.91, 0.88–0.94) and energy levels (1.07, 1.01–1.14) were able to predict injury in these athletes. Examination periods coincided with the highest stress levels and increased likelihood of illness. Additionally, a sudden and high increase in training workload during the preseason was associated with an elevated incidence of injury and illness (r = 0.63). In conclusion, young elite athletes undertaking full-time university study alongside their training and competition loads were vulnerable to increased levels of stress at certain periods of the year (pre-season and examination time). Monitoring and understanding these stressors may assist coaches and support staff in managing overall stress in these athletes.en
dc.format.extent12en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen
dc.relationThe original publication is available from - Frontiers Media - https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00034en
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00034en
dc.rights© 2019 Hamlin, Wilkes, Elliot, Lizamore and Kathiravel.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectstudent athletesen
dc.subjectacademic stressen
dc.subjectathletic performanceen
dc.subjectinjuryen
dc.subjectathletic monitoringen
dc.subjectillnessen
dc.subjectsport trainingen
dc.subjectathlete monitoringen
dc.subjectstudent-athletesen
dc.titleMonitoring training loads and perceived stress in young elite university athletesen
dc.typeJournal Article
lu.contributor.unitLincoln Universityen
lu.contributor.unitFaculty of Environment, Society and Designen
lu.contributor.unitDepartment of Tourism, Sport and Societyen
lu.contributor.uniten
lu.contributor.uniten
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fphys.2019.00034en
dc.subject.anzsrc110602 Exercise Physiologyen
dc.subject.anzsrc1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciencesen
dc.subject.anzsrc170114 Sport and Exercise Psychologyen
dc.relation.isPartOfFrontiers in Physiologyen
pubs.notesArticle ID 34en
pubs.organisational-group/LU
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Faculty of Environment, Society and Design
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Faculty of Environment, Society and Design/DTSS
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Research Management Office
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Research Management Office/2018 PBRF Staff group
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
pubs.volume10en
dc.rights.licenceAttributionen
dc.rights.licenceAttributionen
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7941-8554
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5594-4699


Files in this item

Default Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons AttributionCreative Commons Attribution
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons AttributionCreative Commons Attribution