Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrush, GJ
dc.contributor.authorClemes, Michael
dc.contributor.authorGan, C
dc.date.accessioned2009-04-07T03:15:00Z
dc.date.issued1995-09
dc.identifier.issn1173-0854
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/969
dc.description.abstractIn spite of the significant benefits that can be derived from training on safe and efficient agrichemical application and management, many primary producers do not undertake formal agrichemical training. An identified reason for the low level of participation in agrichemical training is that many primary producers believe their current agrichemical practices are safe and efficient (Gee, 1993). In addition, participation in agrichemical training courses, and exposure to the benefits of information on safe and efficient agrichemical use and management, is ultimately dependent upon recognition of a need or a desire for such training on the part of primary producers (Bruner, 1986). The purpose of this paper is to examine the factors that influence producers' decisions or desires for agrichemical training. A qualitative choice model is developed to evaluate the influencing factors. Conclusions drawn from the analysis are presented, and the implications for agrichemical training providers and primary sector policy analysts are discussed.
dc.format.extentpp.45-58
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLincoln University. Commerce Division.
dc.relationThe original publication is available from Lincoln University. Commerce Division. - http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6297(199701/02)13:1%3C45::aid-agr5%3E3.0.co;2-n
dc.subjectagrichemical practices
dc.subjectagrichemical education
dc.subjectdecision making
dc.subjectattitudes
dc.subjecteconomic aspects
dc.subjecthazardous substances
dc.subjectworkplace training
dc.subjectproblem recognition
dc.titleThe impacts of attitudes, information, situation and behaviour on problem recognition : the impact on agrichemical training
dc.typeDiscussion Paper
dc.subject.marsdenFields of Research::340000 Economics::340200 Applied Economics::340202 Environment and resource economics
dc.subject.marsdenFields of Research::340000 Economics::340200 Applied Economics::340201 Agricultural economics
dc.subject.marsdenFields of Research::300000 Agricultural, Veterinary and Environmental Sciences::300900 Land, Parks and Agriculture Management::300901 Farm management, rural management and agribusiness
lu.contributor.unitLincoln University
lu.contributor.unitFaculty of Agribusiness and Commerce
lu.contributor.unitDepartment of Financial and Business Systems
lu.contributor.unitDepartment of Agribusiness and Markets
lu.contributor.unit|LU|Research Management Office|PE20
pubs.issue1
pubs.organisational-group|LU
pubs.organisational-group|LU|Faculty of Agribusiness and Commerce
pubs.organisational-group|LU|Faculty of Agribusiness and Commerce|FABS
pubs.organisational-group|LU|Research Management Office
pubs.organisational-group|LU|Faculty of Agribusiness and Commerce|AGMK
pubs.organisational-group|LU|Research Management Office|QE18
pubs.organisational-group|LU|Research Management Office|PE20
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6297(199701/02)13:1%3C45::aid-agr5%3E3.0.co;2-n
pubs.volume13
dc.identifier.eissn1520-6297
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0438-8693


Files in this item

Default Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record